This may appear to start out as a
confusing, multi-faceted story about Toyota Australia, but bear with me.
The automotive media has been hurling
bouquets at Holden and Ford Australia for years, because of the companies’
well-known flair for initiative, innovation, can-do approach and the
instinctive ingenuity of their design and engineering staffs.
However, Toyota Motor Company Australia
(TMCA) has its own story of bulldozed
independence and successful initiatives. Also, under ex-CEO John Conomos, TMCA
followed the Japanese lead and played the long game. Investments that were
seemingly silly, proved to be right, further down the road.
|John Conomos, AO|
By global measure TMCA’s local design,
engineering and manufacturing facilities are tiny, and one might think
ineffectual, but they punched above their weight. TMCA fought for its
independence from its Japanese parent, and managed to win some key battles. I
don’t think enough people understand the boldness of its moves and the benefits
they brought to the company and its employees.
Three examples stand out. For a long time
been Australia’s best-selling car (it drifts in and out of top
spot), and it’s one of the main planks in TMCA’s model structure.
to sell the car with an automatic transmission in order to appeal to the widest
Australian market, and the parent said NO, we’re moving to CVT, if necessary. The
automatic transmission used in the Corolla is an ancient Aisin
Warner-manufactured unit, originally designed by the now defunct Borg-Warner.
TMCA was told that the parent would not
invest a dime in further upgrades to the unit, and TMCA said “Fine, we’ll live
with it, as is.” It may not be modern and slick, but it works, and satisfies
In addition, the parent said we’re changing
the name of the model from Corolla to ‘Auris’. TMCA argued that switching the
badge would confuse Australian buyers and simply jettison 38 years of brand
image building. TMCA won that argument too, and Corolla continues to be TMCA’s
most popular car.
Now, let’s consider TMCA’s desire to
capture a bigger slice of Australia’s six-cylinder market. Toyota previously
offered six cylinder models, like the staid Cressida with an inline six; and
the Vienta, which was just a new badge for the Camry with a V6.
In 2000 Toyota launched the Avalon (Model
code XX10) on the USA market. To say this car was conventional, boring and dull
would be massive understatement, and the parent forced TMCA to flog this car
(unsuccessfully) from 2005-2006.
However, in 2005, Conomos’s management team
came up with a very smart idea. As TMCA has very low throughput (see; facility under-utilization) at its Avalon, Victoria, assembly plant and was currently producing
just Corolla and Camry, “Why don’t we kill the dreadful Avalon; drop the V6
option in Camry; change the exterior design slightly and make two cars from
one. The four cylinder Camry and the V6 model (let’s call it Aurion)?”
See huge sigh from Tokyo, and affirmation.
“Okay, go ahead.” So, model XV40 was born.
The parent already knew at that stage of
TMCA’s desire to get the Hybrid Camry on the market in Australia, and that in
order to assemble it Down Under TMCA would have to stop making Corolla and
Now, no one in Australia would admit the
Aurion V6 is a true competitor for a Falcon or Commodore, BUT, Aurion gave TMCA
a player in the segment, and what a refined, sweet car it is. It’s modest in
size compared to its larger competitors, but it boasts one of the sweetest V6
engines ever made, ever! It also has plenty of interior space, large trunk, good equipment levels and excellent performance and fuel economy.
This is a car that Commodore and Falcon
buyers should consider, but they didn’t because most buyers reckoned it was too
gutless to “tow the caravan” and it was Front-Wheel-Drive, not a ballsy rear
drive like the Yanks.
However, TMCA beavered away and although
its sales numbers aren’t show-stoppers, Aurion plods along. It is a very, very
nice car. Having travelled a couple of thousand kilometres in a Sportivo
version, I can say, with hand on heart, it’s a car I would seriously consider.
Now, there’s the saga of the Camry Hybrid.
With a lot of pressure from the Greens, the Australian Labor Government was
planning a ‘Green Car Fund' to boost the development and sales of alternative
fuel vehicles. From a government policy perspective this was clearly one of the
dumbest decisions ever made. It merely confirmed that the ALP and the Greens are
definitely NOT business-focused. They dream a lot these people.
However, TMCA knew it had a car in the
wings which could establish Toyota as a major player in the Green Car Game, and
once it dropped Corolla from its local manufacturing line-up, it could be
assembled alongside Camry and Aurion, making for much smarter utilization of
the manufacturing facilities, and at least creating a talking point for Toyota
in the media and the marketplace.
Okay, it was too expensive; potential
buyers couldn’t see why they needed to switch from conventional fuels to a
hybrid; and there was also the question of used car values, which was a
complete unknown. Not only were buyers unconvinced, more importantly, Toyota dealers
thought it was a waste of space, and marketing resources.
Once again, TMCA walked where no-one else
dared, and has supported Camry Hybrid (yes, they dropped the price, and added
more kit to create a better value equation). But, there is no doubt in my mind
that all the talk about pure electric vehicles is hogwash, and in fact, as a
short term answer to providing an alternative to gas-guzzlers, the Hybrid
system is a smart idea.
Think of it. Great fuel economy, if driven
intelligently; no range-anxiety issues; and it’s a sweet
car to drive. No, it’s not perfect, but credit TMCA with being smart enough to
get into the game from Frame One and establish its bona fides as a key player
in alternative cars.
This is why I have great respect for TMCA.
It has been smart, it has been managed smartly, and it has done a lot with less
resources than its American competitors – who, after having had zillions
contributed by the Australian taxpayer, will swan off into the manufacturing
sunset with nary a care.
Thinking about Toyota’s global presence, I
think its Australian outpost deserves a pat on the back. I don’t blame it for
withdrawing from local manufacture. In terms of economies of scale it never
made sense, but it did keep a lot of Australians employed for a long time,
despite ever-rising costs, most of which were pumped-up by greedy unions.
TMCA, take a bow!
Postscript: Remember Toyota was the company named by the authors of the book, 'The Machine That Changed The World', as the best, most efficient and profitable company in the world! It must be doing something right.