Here’s a triple package of luxury cars
bursting onto the scene with more tech than is good for you; promises of great
driving experiences; and all the baggage of brand image and traditional
heritage.
I speak of the new BMW 540i; the new
Mercedes-Benz E-Class and the Jaguar XF. Driving them back to back reveals not
only big differences, but also exposes my bias (just thought I’d admit that up
front), and for me some definite ideas about what these three cars deliver.
The new BMW 5 Series is being hailed as
BMW’s finest package for some time, and in the m-Sport version I drove it’s not
short of performance, nor handling finesse (on the Sport settings). It’s
beautifully finished, and having ditched controversial design themes, it is now
more conservative than I expect from BMW.
The latest Mercedes-Benz E-Class follows a
similar pattern, and has matured into a stately carriage, with an interior that
looks much more cohesively planned than its C-Class sibling, with its iPad-like
screen ‘growing’ out of the top of the dash. It’s a tech-laden driving
experience, but at no time does it induce a desire to ‘go sporty’.
Now, Britain’s finest luxe competitor, the
Jaguar XF, here powered by its supercharged V6 engine. It features its fair
share of driving technology to keep pace with its competitors, and the ride and
handling is as exemplary as you would expect from Jaguar.
However, that’s the area I find the most
disparate comparison between these three cars. And, you can put that down to
one component – aluminium.
I remember very clearly, that before
attending the launch of the Jaguar XJ, I first drove the competing Mercedes-Benz
S-Class and the BMW 7-Series.
The Jaguar XJ drive program established
new ground rules for large sedans.
The agility of the XJ, with its completely
aluminium platform and body parts produced a large sedan experience marked by
athletiscm, fine control and impressive driver feedback from the road.
This time round with this Trio Luxe, it’s
more of the same. If you truly enjoy a spirited drive every now and then, you
would (should) choose the Jaguar XF. The other two cars in this triple review
come across like grand old men. Not stodgy, but a tad pudgy in their response
and weighting.
No comments:
Post a Comment